JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 23, 2004

A- de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant German Ricardo Espinosa Eissner Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal De Puerto Lopez Y El Tribunal Superior De Bogota.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Comision
  • Inspección municipal de Policía
Corte Constitucional
  • Conocimiento directo de conflicto de competencia para evitar dilaciones injustificadas y proteger derechos fundamentales
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Inspección municipal comisionada
  • Subreglas
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se ordenó a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Bogotá que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la tutela de la referencia, de conformidad con lo establecido en el inciso tercero del numeral 2 del Art. 1º del Decreto Reglamentario 1382 de 2000 que establece que: “cuando la acción de tutela se promueva contra un funcionario o corporación judicial, le será repartida al respectivo superior funcional del accionado”.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ORDENAR a la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Bogota D.C., que asuma de forma inmediata el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.